I'm watching Sarah Palin. I am so ready for this election to be over, for Obama to become President elect (knocking on wood) and for Sarah Palin to go away for at least 3 years.
I am a big fan of women in politics. I worked for a female City Councillor. She was not formally educated but displayed a clear ability to grasp complex issues and to understand the underlying philosophies of government. For instance, she would never call someone a 'socialist' lightly.
I love Hilary Clinton. I admire strong women conservatives like Peggy Noonan, Deborah Grey and there are others I'm sure - Belinda Stronach who is a blue Liberal or red tory, I'm not sure anyone ever really knew. I didn't agree with Kim Campbell but thought it was great that we had a woman Prime Minister and believe she got a rough ride. She at least understood the tenants of conservatism.
Sarah Palin's big credentials are that she is an Energy expert since she comes from Alaska. And yet, she continues to lie and mis-state facts about energy and Alaska's supply. Drill Baby Drill is the lamest chant - it's like saying, Magic baby Magic. T. Boone Pickens, the famous Texan Oilman has endorsed Obama's plan so it's not like Obama is just proposing conservation (which would be a great place to start.) Pickens says we cannot use Oil to get off of Oil and that we cannot wait, drilling is not an answer in and of itself.
I also think that if you are an expert in something, you should be able to at least pronounce the words that are used, such as Nuclear. I'm not a big opponent of Nuclear. I just don't think it makes a lot of economic sense, or at least it hasn't proven itself affordable anywhere in the world. Palin suggested that we teach our children about the importance of "Newk-u-lar power." Please don't give us another 4 years of that stupidity!
The McCain ticket has also made a big deal about Obama's answer to the "Manhattan Project" question - should government lead the effort to discover and implement new alternative energy supplies. McCain rightly believes (as does Obama) that the private sector is the better sector to pursue innovation. However, the R&D costs and eventual implementation costs of alternatives to Carbon-based fuels are so high that the Private Sector ought not to be solely responsible for their development. In other words, government research and resources are needed to support efforts to innovate and incubate new technologies. I believe that is Obama's intent - to financially support the development and implementation of alternatives.
Also remember that it was energy expert McCain who proposed a Gas Tax holiday. I will give credit where it is due and think it has been a mistake of the McCain/Palin team not to play on her great work at getting a pipeline approved. That is fantastic work and displays more than her rambling speeches ever could. Besides, rambling speeches expose what you don't know more than what you do also. ;-)
Americans have to accept a few truths. First, they have to accept that they are the biggest wasters of energy. Acknowledging the problem and recognizing you are powerless are the first steps to addiction recovery after-all. Secondly, they have to understand that the best way to curb mis-use is through economic incentives and dis-incentives. Prices send signals. Reducing energy costs will not discourage waste. The era of cheap energy is largely over. Actually, it was a myth anyway since we've deferred all of the environmental costs and hidden many health costs and created unsustainable systems.
Why, if the McCain ticket is so knowledgeable about government spending and energy have they made no reference to the impending crisis in Highway funding. The Highway Trust fund is nearly bankrupt, requires reauthorization and the Gas Tax has shown itself to be counter-productive and unsustainable as a revenue source. McCain knows Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters quite well since they are both from Arizona and Peters is former Arizona Secretary of Transportation. McCain has been oddly silent though so too has Obama. This is just one of the many areas where real issues aren't being discussed.
Now, Palin and McCain have been name-calling of late, using the term socialist to describe Obama's modest tax plan. Beyond being totally inaccurate, an insult to actual socialists and actually telling us more about McCain/Palin's own ignorance, it's quite hypocritical. The Obama campaign could easily call McCain a facist, since he's very militaristic, supported nationalizing banks and believes in the corporatism of 'Country First' while having a running mate who believes that Americans are Gods chosen people. But they of course are better than that and know that name calling is ultimately a sad comment on oneself more than it is on the target.
How is further subsidizing oil companies, Nuclear development companies and other energy providers not socialist or even facist? McCain, who's own party's President was charged with running the US economy, supported the bailout. Meanwhile, the Democrats, showing bi-partisan cooperation supported the President's plan since ultimately it is the President who is looked upon and appoints such luminaries as the Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman of the Federal Reserve and others. So McCain has supported nationalizing banks, the most socialist measure ever and has excused that as an action needed to address a crisis.
I think that most people dislike intellectual dishonesty, hypocrisy and inconsistency. Unfortunately, those have all been the calling cards of the McCain/Palin ticket. Now we should care that some bald, angry, overweight, biggoted, self-centered moron from Ohio is endorsing Obama? Joe the liar supports McCain? Surprise surprise. He probably bought McCain's promise to reduce gas prices and reduce food costs at the same time. Wonder if he also has 'land' in Florida?
Lastly, if McCain is an energy expert and an economic expert and a supporter of anti-Climate Change actions, why has he not proposed something like cap-and-trade and/or carbon taxes? Guess that would be 'straight talk'?
Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
McCain vs McCain
"I'm a foot soldier from the Reagan Revolution."
"I believe in regulation."
"I believe in de-regulation."
"I'm for the bail-out."
"I'm not for a bail-out."
"I believe in a free market."
"I want to limit CEO compensation packages."
"I believe in tax cuts."
"I'm experienced."
"I represent change."
"I own 9 houses." (No, wait. He didn't say that - he couldn't remember how many he owns!)
"I care about the Middle Class." (No, wait. He didn't say that. He said Main Street.)
"I don't believe in taxing the wealthiest at a higher rate."
"I believe in giving Americans tax credits for mortgages."
"We need to address the problems that Americans face."
"We need to freeze spending."
"We don't need the UN to tell us what to do....except in
"I can work with our partners."
"You don't tell your partners what you're going to do."
"I took on these guys, I took on those guys."
"I can work with anyone."
"I do not have a temper."
You might think that these statements were made by two separate candidates in the US Presidential election. Unfortunately, these are all quotes or paraphrases from John McCain. McCain is a populist hypocrite and a public liar.
On this morning's ABC's This Week with George Stephanopolous, he was trying to clean up after his botched Debate. What a loser. This man has contradicted himself every day of the last two weeks.
Foreign Affairs:
Palin says "If we know Osama is there we should go into Pakistan." Meanwhile, McCain tries to convince the American people that Obama wants to invade Pakistan rather than send strike forces in to take out Bin Laden. Obama has taken the George Bush position (that killed John Kerry in 2004) that America is responsible for its own security and will answer to no one. Obama means that if you see Osama Bin Laden on Satellite or have intelligence as to his whereabouts - you take him out with a covert, strategic strike - just as Palin has suggested and most Americans would agree with. Pakistan, and the governing party must understand that this is a potential consequence of their inaction - by not allowing them to respond ahead of time, to assist NATO in Torra Borra, McCain exposes his Pakistani allies to retribution from extremists in Pakistan. "You don't tell them what you're going to do." He is so totally out to lunch on this issue it's not funny. Lie to your friends, be honest with the indifferent and threaten enemies seems to be his M-O.
By McCain's reasoning - you can openly threaten states that are hostile to you but you cannot threaten to cut off foreign aid to allies when they don't help you. Is anyone buying this bullshit? That Americans do not see him as an Angry Old Man who will do or say anything for power is startling.
On Domestic Issues:
McCain supports the Bush Tax cuts and is continually trying to convince the American people that Obama would increase taxes on Americans - particularly on the middle class. How do people let this guy lie to them? Go to obama.com and you can see Barack's tax plan. It is clear that it will shift burdens from low-wage earners, single-income families and middle-class Americans on to Corporations and the rich.
John McCain says he doesn't believe in the greed of Wall Street and the excess that is rewarded. Yet he does not want to tax the rich at any higher rate. In essence, he wants a flat tax. How can people not see through this? Forget the compensation packages - like Earmarks they are a visual yet ultimately fairly inconsequential part of the problem. Allow Shareholders to limit compensation packages - they ultimately own publicly-traded companies. The Federal government has the ability to claw-back compensation packages by a much simpler measure - TAX THEM!!! Instead, McCain is playing populist - they all are with respect to the financial bailout.
Health Care:
McCain argues that nationalizing Insurance means telling people which Doctor they can visit. What an idiot. Americans: I am Canadian and can chose my own Doctor - though we do have a shortage as 'greedy' doctors go to America to earn money off the backs of your sick and fail to pay us back for our investment in their education - so, thanks for running a profit-drive health care industry. We take your guns, you take our Doctors. Back to my point. By eliminating profit-driven Insurance companies from the Health Care equation, you eliminate a 3rd party, non-medical decision maker saying no to necessary treatments. (Hello? Greed anyone?) Look at the facts. US Health Care delivery costs more and has worse outcomes than in Canada. FACT.
It's basic. Government does not profit from its activities and when it delivers a surplus - that's the peoples' surplus. AIG, a major insurance company, with major health care services and investments in health insurance is going to be bailed out by the Federal Government. AIG will at some point, deliver benefits to its shareholders though that looks like it will be the American people for the foreseeable future. So...AIG makes money from people who need health care/insurance. They and their competitors say no to services they perceive as unnecessary and pay-out only portions of coverage for services - a health care coupon as it's called.
Here's how it works in Canada. I need health care, I go to my doctor or Hospital. I get treatment. Sometimes that means medication, a portion of which is covered by our Socialized drug-purchasing policies - those programs that attract AARP buses to Toronto from Buffalo to buy cheap drugs. Sometimes my health care entails a wait. But I never, ever get a bill for it and I can feel comfortable knowing that the person serving me my food also has the same opportunity and that they're not coming to work with an infectious disease because they can't afford a doctor's visit or medication to solve their problem.
So John McCain talks big about limiting greed and corruption. Then he endorses the current Health Care approach - a license to Insurers and private Hospitals to print money. What a liar. What a hypocrite. What a jerk.
Earmarks:
Much ado about nothing? Earmarks totaled $18 Billion last year. The US spends 10 Billion everyday in Iraq. Earmarks pay for local projects such as needed road fixes that don't meet bureaucratic criteria, bridges to encourage economic development (under SAFETLU bridges are assessed only from cost-benefit/transportation perspective) and cultural projects like privately run Holocaust museums.
Spending Freeze:
I'm not sure what McCain meant by this. If he meant that when he took office, no cheques would be issued except those he excluded (Defense, Veterans Affairs, maybe one other) then he is proposing to close Washington DC until he gets educated on line-by-line spending - in a budget of over $3 trillion! He has already shown that he is a slow-learner. Does this mean that DC would be closed until sometime in 2010 when he understands finally how government works? I'm confused. How will congressmen get to Congress with all that garbage piling up on the streets of DC? Does he mean that Congressmen won't get paid? The Federal government cannot simply have a spending freeze of any substantial weight since most of what the Federal Government spends is in entitlements - programmed spending to deliver... core programs. Does he close the Federal Highway Administration? Does he close the FDA with all the food security issues the US faces? What exactly does John McCain mean by a spending freeze? It sounds great because it plays on our passions - which are emotional, not rational.
How will John McCain fix the bankrupt Highway Trust Fund? He's already stated he wants a Gas Tax holiday. And here is my conclusion:
The problems in the American Economy have been created by a detachment with reality and a lack of effort to address cracks in the system as they've developed like so many cracks in the New Orleans levies. Greed fuels the whole thing - whether that's an expectation of lower taxes or mortgages based on good wishes instead of economic solvency, unlimited credit and ego-driven anger against those who succeed under the current rules. Americans love to kick their success stories while also boasting of the American Dream. There must be some parallel to psychological conditions, like schizophrenia and/or paranoid delusion but definitely ADD.
America, if you want another high-functioning Moron as your President, one who will lie to you, lie to your neighbours, threaten your foes and take us to the brink of all-out Global war...then please, vote for John McCain. If you want this ship we call earth, to steer itself successfully through the challenges we face, then vote for bold change - vote for Obama, or please for the sake of the rest of us on Earth, just don't vote at all.
New Conspiracy Theory: Bush went after Saddam cause he went after his Daddy. Given McCain's quoting of Teddy Roosevelt's 'walk softly with a big stick' (totally misinterpreted by the way) and his propensity to not tell anyone what you are really thinking and McCain's well known anger towards those who have ever crossed him, even once, let alone torturing him for 10-years leaving his body scarred and maimed .... McCain secretly wants to send the US Military back to Vietnam to make those m-f's pay for what they did to him!
"I believe in regulation."
"I believe in de-regulation."
"I'm for the bail-out."
"I'm not for a bail-out."
"I believe in a free market."
"I want to limit CEO compensation packages."
"I believe in tax cuts."
"I'm experienced."
"I represent change."
"I own 9 houses." (No, wait. He didn't say that - he couldn't remember how many he owns!)
"I care about the Middle Class." (No, wait. He didn't say that. He said Main Street.)
"I don't believe in taxing the wealthiest at a higher rate."
"I believe in giving Americans tax credits for mortgages."
"We need to address the problems that Americans face."
"We need to freeze spending."
"We don't need the UN to tell us what to do....except in
"I can work with our partners."
"You don't tell your partners what you're going to do."
"I took on these guys, I took on those guys."
"I can work with anyone."
"I do not have a temper."
You might think that these statements were made by two separate candidates in the US Presidential election. Unfortunately, these are all quotes or paraphrases from John McCain. McCain is a populist hypocrite and a public liar.
On this morning's ABC's This Week with George Stephanopolous, he was trying to clean up after his botched Debate. What a loser. This man has contradicted himself every day of the last two weeks.
Foreign Affairs:
Palin says "If we know Osama is there we should go into Pakistan." Meanwhile, McCain tries to convince the American people that Obama wants to invade Pakistan rather than send strike forces in to take out Bin Laden. Obama has taken the George Bush position (that killed John Kerry in 2004) that America is responsible for its own security and will answer to no one. Obama means that if you see Osama Bin Laden on Satellite or have intelligence as to his whereabouts - you take him out with a covert, strategic strike - just as Palin has suggested and most Americans would agree with. Pakistan, and the governing party must understand that this is a potential consequence of their inaction - by not allowing them to respond ahead of time, to assist NATO in Torra Borra, McCain exposes his Pakistani allies to retribution from extremists in Pakistan. "You don't tell them what you're going to do." He is so totally out to lunch on this issue it's not funny. Lie to your friends, be honest with the indifferent and threaten enemies seems to be his M-O.
By McCain's reasoning - you can openly threaten states that are hostile to you but you cannot threaten to cut off foreign aid to allies when they don't help you. Is anyone buying this bullshit? That Americans do not see him as an Angry Old Man who will do or say anything for power is startling.
On Domestic Issues:
McCain supports the Bush Tax cuts and is continually trying to convince the American people that Obama would increase taxes on Americans - particularly on the middle class. How do people let this guy lie to them? Go to obama.com and you can see Barack's tax plan. It is clear that it will shift burdens from low-wage earners, single-income families and middle-class Americans on to Corporations and the rich.
John McCain says he doesn't believe in the greed of Wall Street and the excess that is rewarded. Yet he does not want to tax the rich at any higher rate. In essence, he wants a flat tax. How can people not see through this? Forget the compensation packages - like Earmarks they are a visual yet ultimately fairly inconsequential part of the problem. Allow Shareholders to limit compensation packages - they ultimately own publicly-traded companies. The Federal government has the ability to claw-back compensation packages by a much simpler measure - TAX THEM!!! Instead, McCain is playing populist - they all are with respect to the financial bailout.
Health Care:
McCain argues that nationalizing Insurance means telling people which Doctor they can visit. What an idiot. Americans: I am Canadian and can chose my own Doctor - though we do have a shortage as 'greedy' doctors go to America to earn money off the backs of your sick and fail to pay us back for our investment in their education - so, thanks for running a profit-drive health care industry. We take your guns, you take our Doctors. Back to my point. By eliminating profit-driven Insurance companies from the Health Care equation, you eliminate a 3rd party, non-medical decision maker saying no to necessary treatments. (Hello? Greed anyone?) Look at the facts. US Health Care delivery costs more and has worse outcomes than in Canada. FACT.
It's basic. Government does not profit from its activities and when it delivers a surplus - that's the peoples' surplus. AIG, a major insurance company, with major health care services and investments in health insurance is going to be bailed out by the Federal Government. AIG will at some point, deliver benefits to its shareholders though that looks like it will be the American people for the foreseeable future. So...AIG makes money from people who need health care/insurance. They and their competitors say no to services they perceive as unnecessary and pay-out only portions of coverage for services - a health care coupon as it's called.
Here's how it works in Canada. I need health care, I go to my doctor or Hospital. I get treatment. Sometimes that means medication, a portion of which is covered by our Socialized drug-purchasing policies - those programs that attract AARP buses to Toronto from Buffalo to buy cheap drugs. Sometimes my health care entails a wait. But I never, ever get a bill for it and I can feel comfortable knowing that the person serving me my food also has the same opportunity and that they're not coming to work with an infectious disease because they can't afford a doctor's visit or medication to solve their problem.
So John McCain talks big about limiting greed and corruption. Then he endorses the current Health Care approach - a license to Insurers and private Hospitals to print money. What a liar. What a hypocrite. What a jerk.
Earmarks:
Much ado about nothing? Earmarks totaled $18 Billion last year. The US spends 10 Billion everyday in Iraq. Earmarks pay for local projects such as needed road fixes that don't meet bureaucratic criteria, bridges to encourage economic development (under SAFETLU bridges are assessed only from cost-benefit/transportation perspective) and cultural projects like privately run Holocaust museums.
Spending Freeze:
I'm not sure what McCain meant by this. If he meant that when he took office, no cheques would be issued except those he excluded (Defense, Veterans Affairs, maybe one other) then he is proposing to close Washington DC until he gets educated on line-by-line spending - in a budget of over $3 trillion! He has already shown that he is a slow-learner. Does this mean that DC would be closed until sometime in 2010 when he understands finally how government works? I'm confused. How will congressmen get to Congress with all that garbage piling up on the streets of DC? Does he mean that Congressmen won't get paid? The Federal government cannot simply have a spending freeze of any substantial weight since most of what the Federal Government spends is in entitlements - programmed spending to deliver... core programs. Does he close the Federal Highway Administration? Does he close the FDA with all the food security issues the US faces? What exactly does John McCain mean by a spending freeze? It sounds great because it plays on our passions - which are emotional, not rational.
How will John McCain fix the bankrupt Highway Trust Fund? He's already stated he wants a Gas Tax holiday. And here is my conclusion:
The problems in the American Economy have been created by a detachment with reality and a lack of effort to address cracks in the system as they've developed like so many cracks in the New Orleans levies. Greed fuels the whole thing - whether that's an expectation of lower taxes or mortgages based on good wishes instead of economic solvency, unlimited credit and ego-driven anger against those who succeed under the current rules. Americans love to kick their success stories while also boasting of the American Dream. There must be some parallel to psychological conditions, like schizophrenia and/or paranoid delusion but definitely ADD.
America, if you want another high-functioning Moron as your President, one who will lie to you, lie to your neighbours, threaten your foes and take us to the brink of all-out Global war...then please, vote for John McCain. If you want this ship we call earth, to steer itself successfully through the challenges we face, then vote for bold change - vote for Obama, or please for the sake of the rest of us on Earth, just don't vote at all.
New Conspiracy Theory: Bush went after Saddam cause he went after his Daddy. Given McCain's quoting of Teddy Roosevelt's 'walk softly with a big stick' (totally misinterpreted by the way) and his propensity to not tell anyone what you are really thinking and McCain's well known anger towards those who have ever crossed him, even once, let alone torturing him for 10-years leaving his body scarred and maimed .... McCain secretly wants to send the US Military back to Vietnam to make those m-f's pay for what they did to him!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
